Blog entries
-
Why I will not read your f....king script!!!
Wednesday, Oct 7, 2009 4:39AM / Standard Entry / Members only
3 commentsFor all the screenwriters out there who is writing SPEC scripts hoping to break into the industry...
I came across this article recently, after reading it, hated how honest it is and couldn't help but understand where the writer is coming from...
I have written my share of SPEC scripts and I have come across a few of these producers types myself, thing is tho, I too have made some of the mistakes they talked about in this article, so may be there is something to be learned here...
The point of this article I think is not to discourage writers from trying, but to give them an idea of how someone on the receiving end of your script feels...
Having read it myself, I still believe that good writing will find its way to the hands of the right people... it might take a long time, but if your script is good, it will find its reader...
I will not read your fucking script.That's simple enough, isn't it? "I will not read your fucking script." What's not clear about that? There's nothing personal about it, nothing loaded, nothing complicated. I simply have no interest in reading your fucking screenplay. None whatsoever.
If that seems unfair, I'll make you a deal. In return for you not asking me to read your fucking script, I will not ask you to wash my fucking car, or take my fucking picture, or represent me in fucking court, or take out my fucking gall bladder, or whatever the fuck it is that you do for a living.
You're a lovely person. Whatever time we've spent together has, I'm sure, been pleasurable for both of us. I quite enjoyed that conversation we once had about structure and theme, and why Sergio Leone is the greatest director who ever lived. Yes, we bonded, and yes, I wish you luck in all your endeavors, and it would thrill me no end to hear that you had sold your screenplay, and that it had been made into the best movie since Godfather Part II.
But I will not read your fucking script.
At this point, you should walk away, firm in your conviction that I'm a dick. But if you're interested in growing as a human being and recognizing that it is, in fact, you who is the dick in this situation, please read on.
Yes. That's right. I called you a dick. Because you created this situation. You put me in this spot where my only option is to acquiesce to your demands or be the bad guy. That, my friend, is the very definition of a dick move.
I was recently cornered by a young man of my barest acquaintance.
I doubt we've exchanged a hundred words. But he's dating someone I know, and he cornered me in the right place at the right time, and asked me to read a two-page synopsis for a script he'd been working on for the last year. He was submitting the synopsis to some contest or program, and wanted to get a professional opinion.
Now, I normally have a standard response to people who ask me to read their scripts, and it's the simple truth: I have two piles next to my bed. One is scripts from good friends, and the other is manuscripts and books and scripts my agents have sent to me that I have to read for work. Every time I pick up a friend's script, I feel guilty that I'm ignoring work. Every time I pick something up from the other pile, I feel guilty that I'm ignoring my friends. If I read yours before any of that, I'd be an awful person.
Most people get that. But sometimes you find yourself in a situation where the guilt factor is really high, or someone plays on a relationship or a perceived obligation, and it's hard to escape without seeming rude. Then, I tell them I'll read it, but if I can put it down after ten pages, I will. They always go for that, because nobody ever believes you can put their script down once you start.
But hell, this was a two page synopsis, and there was no time to go into either song or dance, and it was just easier to take it. How long can two pages take?
Weeks, is the answer.
And this is why I will not read your fucking script.
It rarely takes more than a page to recognize that you're in the presence of someone who can write, but it only takes a sentence to know you're dealing with someone who can't.
(By the way, here's a simple way to find out if you're a writer. If you disagree with that statement, you're not a writer. Because, you see, writers are also readers.)
You may want to allow for the fact that this fellow had never written a synopsis before, but that doesn't excuse the inability to form a decent sentence, or an utter lack of facility with language and structure. The story described was clearly of great importance to him, but he had done nothing to convey its specifics to an impartial reader. What I was handed was, essentially, a barely coherent list of events, some connected, some not so much. Characters wander around aimlessly, do things for no reason, vanish, reappear, get arrested for unnamed crimes, and make wild, life-altering decisions for no reason. Half a paragraph is devoted to describing the smell and texture of a piece of food, but the climactic central event of the film is glossed over in a sentence. The death of the hero is not even mentioned. One sentence describes a scene he's in, the next describes people showing up at his funeral. I could go on, but I won't. This is the sort of thing that would earn you a D minus in any Freshman Comp class.
Which brings us to an ugly truth about many aspiring screenwriters: They think that screenwriting doesn't actually require the ability to write, just the ability to come up with a cool story that would make a cool movie. Screenwriting is widely regarded as the easiest way to break into the movie business, because it doesn't require any kind of training, skill or equipment. Everybody can write, right? And because they believe that, they don't regard working screenwriters with any kind of real respect. They will hand you a piece of inept writing without a second thought, because you do not have to be a writer to be a screenwriter.
So. I read the thing. And it hurt, man. It really hurt. I was dying to find something positive to say, and there was nothing. And the truth is, saying something positive about this thing would be the nastiest, meanest and most dishonest thing I could do. Because here's the thing: not only is it cruel to encourage the hopeless, but you cannot discourage a writer. If someone can talk you out of being a writer, you're not a writer. If I can talk you out of being a writer, I've done you a favor, because now you'll be free to pursue your real talent, whatever that may be. And, for the record, everybody has one. The lucky ones figure out what that is. The unlucky ones keep on writing shitty screenplays and asking me to read them.
To make matters worse, this guy (and his girlfriend) had begged me to be honest with him. He was frustrated by the responses he'd gotten from friends, because he felt they were going easy on him, and he wanted real criticism. They never do, of course. What they want is a few tough notes to give the illusion of honesty, and then some pats on the head. What they want--always--is encouragement, even when they shouldn't get any.
Do you have any idea how hard it is to tell someone that they've spent a year wasting their time? Do you know how much blood and sweat goes into that criticism? Because you want to tell the truth, but you want to make absolutely certain that it comes across honestly and without cruelty. I did more rewrites on that fucking e-mail than I did on my last three studio projects.
My first draft was ridiculous. I started with specific notes, and after a while, found I'd written three pages on the first two paragraphs. That wasn't the right approach. So I tossed it, and by the time I was done, I'd come up with something that was relatively brief, to the point, and considerate as hell. The main point I made was that he'd fallen prey to a fallacy that nails a lot of first timers. He was way more interested in telling his one story than in being a writer. It was like buying all the parts to a car and starting to build it before learning the basics of auto mechanics. You'll learn a lot along the way, I said, but you'll never have a car that runs.
(I should mention that while I was composing my response, he pulled the ultimate amateur move, and sent me an e-mail saying, "If you haven't read it yet, don't! I have a new draft. Read this!" In other words, "The draft I told you was ready for professional input, wasn't actually.")
I advised him that if all he was interested in was this story, he should find a writer and work with him; or, if he really wanted to be a writer, start at the beginning and take some classes, and start studying seriously.
And you know what? I shouldn't have bothered. Because for all the hair I pulled out, for all the weight and seriousness I gave his request for a real, professional critique, his response was a terse "Thanks for your opinion." And, the inevitable fallout--a week later a mutual friend asked me, "What's this dick move I hear you pulled on Whatsisname?"
So now this guy and his girlfriend think I'm an asshole, and the truth of the matter is, the story really ended the moment he handed me the goddamn synopsis. Because if I'd just said "No" then and there, they'd still think I'm an asshole. Only difference is, I wouldn't have had to spend all that time trying to communicate thoughtfully and honestly with someone who just wanted a pat on the head, and, more importantly, I wouldn't have had to read that godawful piece of shit.
You are not owed a read from a professional, even if you think you have an in, and even if you think it's not a huge imposition. It's not your choice to make. This needs to be clear--when you ask a professional for their take on your material, you're not just asking them to take an hour or two out of their life, you're asking them to give you--gratis--the acquired knowledge, insight, and skill of years of work. It is no different than asking your friend the house painter to paint your living room during his off hours.
There's a great story about Pablo Picasso. Some guy told Picasso he'd pay him to draw a picture on a napkin. Picasso whipped out a pen and banged out a sketch, handed it to the guy, and said, "One million dollars, please."
"A million dollars?" the guy exclaimed. "That only took you thirty seconds!"
"Yes," said Picasso. "But it took me fifty years to learn how to draw that in thirty seconds."
Like the cad who asks the professional for a free read, the guy simply didn't have enough respect for the artist to think about what he was asking for. If you think it's only about the time, then ask one of your non-writer friends to read it. Hell, they might even enjoy your script. They might look upon you with a newfound respect. It could even come to pass that they call up a friend in the movie business and help you sell it, and soon, all your dreams will come true. But me?
I will not read your fucking script...
My blog More entries >
-
And the Best Actress goes to...
Sunday, Nov 15, 2009 9:46PM (2 comments)
-
Please vote for this "Crash the Superbowl" Ad
Thursday, Nov 12, 2009 4:11PM
-
Video Tapes... DVDs... Anthony Lapaglia...
Tuesday, Nov 10, 2009 3:26PM (2 comments)
-
Are there any Good Samaritans left in the world?
Wednesday, Nov 4, 2009 1:27AM (8 comments)
-
Getting old and out of shape... time to lose some weight...
Thursday, Oct 29, 2009 1:56AM (6 comments)
- More entries >
Stats
- Chan was born in Hong Kong in 1981 and grew up in Brisbane, Australia. He wrote, directed and produced his first English feature film ‘Half Lit’《暗火》in 2003, It was hailed by critic Dr...Chan was born in Hong Kong in 1981 and grew up in Brisbane, Australia. He wrote, directed and produced his first English feature film ‘Half Lit’《暗火》in 2003, It was hailed by critic Dr. Stephen SZE Man Hung (Chairman of H.K. Film Critic’s Association) as ‘a relentless and uncompromising vision’, labeling CHAN as ‘a rising filmmaker to watch.’
Upcoming film projects as writer/director include, “Coming Up Roses” 《玫瑰未來》(Producer: Stanley Kwan Kam Pang) “Jiang Hu 2” 《江湖2 (義)》 (Producer: Eric Tsang Chi Wai) and he is seeking financing for his sci-fi epic “The Battle of Hong Kong” 《九港大戰》about a war between Kowloon and Island City of Hong Kong.
陳翊恆 (Daniel Chan) 1981年生於香港,在澳洲長大。熱愛電影的他經多年的努力,在2003年在澳洲完成他第一套長片《Half Lit》(暗火)。2004年,《暗火》獲得影評人史文鴻博士 (前香港影評人協會會長) 的高度評價及,更得到名導演關錦鵬的賞識被邀請合作編寫劇本。陳即將在2008年為關的四千萬元新作《花落風流》當策劃。
2006年,24歲的他,被監製曾志偉邀請編寫及執導《江湖》系列電影《江湖2》,一部以史詩式手法講述一名黑社會傳奇人物在香港回歸前退出黑幫的故事。陳現正開始籌備工作,即將於2009年開鏡。
2006年,陳成立了「機會主意電影工作室」 (Chance Pictures Limited),發展科幻戰爭電影《九港大戰》三部曲。計劃被獲選為2006年台灣影視創投會決賽作品之一,其他作品導演包括吳宇森、蘇照彬及陳果。
陳剛為小美工作室執導及拍攝了2007郭富城演唱會主題歌《舞林正傳》的Music Video及演唱會電視廣告。其後為廣告公司DDB執導5段有關Microsoft電腦軟件的宣傳短片。2007年,陳正跟監製關錦鵬及中國電影公司吉安永嘉合作發展新電影計劃《玫瑰未來》。
- Occupation: Director , Screenwriter , Film/TV Producer
- Age: 28
- Gender: Male
- Total visits: 52,152



















Entry comments (3)