a long break results pretty badly. i forgot how to insert pictures into a post haha..
anyway, mika is the name i randomly give to my new camera

its official name is vivitar ultra wide and slim. well, mika is easier to type than vivitar or katrina or molly or whatever!
after for like 2 years, i finally got my first 'lomo' camera. the parentheses is because the camera i got is not exactly a lomo camera, but it does produce lomo-like effects haha.. it's a cheap plastic camera.
oh yeah.. a picture of mika haha.
mika: hello!
i bought mika online from another gal.. but before that, phew.. the trouble i went through!
i asked a few overseas frens to help me get them, either locally or through their ebays. numerous bumps!
i went to those old shops at larkin to see if they stocked any model that i want but they had none. suggested me to go to those small small towns and try my luck. of course, which other small town would be more perfect than parit raja? hahaha..
so i got off at parit raja on my way back to bp and went camera-hunting! i tried all possible shops, from camera shops to those shops selling chapalang stuff, but none had the model i was looking for!
luckily 皇天不负苦心人, i landed my hands on one after bout 2 months!
there was so much to do before i can get mika up and running. buying film, learning how to load the film, learning how to shoot a picture, things to note, and also steps to unload the film! google and youtube are amazing!
here's a comparison of the pics taken at bali from my digital camera, sony t20 and pics from mika.
of course, sample failure..
underexposed shot from bangkok...
the novelty of shooting in film is indescribable. you dun get to review the picture you took instantly, so u wun know how your picture will turn out.. haha, also the action of winding the wheel to move to the next frame produces the tiak-tiak-tiak sound, which my sis kept making fun of! ah.. and the joy of peering through the viewfinder! i got a bit confused between the digital and mika after that

this is my fav picture from bali
this one got more votes though... which do you prefer?
of course, shooting in film has its disadvantages.
no 1. you have to finish the whole roll before u get to see the pics.
no 2. developing cost an arm and a leg.
no 3. the pictures dun have the resolution offered by digital camera, which i'd like to have sometimes.. oooo, but the vignetting!
no 4. no auto-timer!
no 5. ppl think you are crazy.
but anything vintage always fascinate me! the artistic/fashion shots taken with a lomo camera are amazing.. but i really bu she de! on average, a picture costs bout 50cents! and that's soft copy still. you dun even have the physical picture! so most of the time, i'd rather have someone's face in them haha..
the next film camera i wanna buy...
a golden half
or a Supersampler!
that is, after i get a proper digital camera first! my t20 is a bit moody these days haha.. of course. there's still the compact vs dslr fight.. hmm..
