第一次看这部片子的时候对搞笑的部分最有印象，造型那里真是“笑到爆”，这么有趣的创意绝对是天才。我猜是Daniel想出来的吧，其它三个都比较老实，应该不会那么鬼灵精怪，事实上，这个创意让我想到往窗户上贴大字报的鬼主意。

I was impressed the most about funny of this film when i saw it the first time. Specially at the scene of "style", I couldn't stop laughing. That is definitly a talented idea. I guess it must be Daniel because it reminded me of those posters on windows. Such "big ideas" look like come from "tricky" Daniel, not the other good boys.

笑过之后，注意到影片的内容。我觉得这个电影想告诉大家很多东西，内容很丰富，而且有些故事，用来支持要讲的内容，编辑得很精彩。不象现在流行的一些电影，拍的很华丽，却没有内容，还炒作一些莫名奇妙的东西出来，冒充根本没有的灵魂。让我们这些看电影的人觉得他们根本没有拍电影的诚意，只有赚大钱的欲望。但是四大天王不同，它让我觉得你们有诚意去拍一部叫做"电影"的东西。

As to the most important part of a film -- meaning and story, I think Heavenly King does tell something to us, actually, it has many topics, and there are lots of stories support these topics. It is excellent. You know, we've tired with those films which are gorgeous but no meaning/story,even they pretend they have something. We know they don't want to make film but money. Heavenly King is different, i can see you make film in heart.

另外，影片把记录的部分和后补拍的部分融合的很好。我觉得后补拍的部分还是挺多的，但是分不出彼此。这说明重视细节，很用心在拍。

And, the documentary footage and staged footage are seamless. I feel your performance is a bit more than I heard before, but they can not be identified. it is good you take the effort to take care that.

演员里面，我想这么一部半纪录片，最重要是不要看出来在表演而不是记录。这个每个人都做得不错，你们四个专业的不说了，David和Teresa也不错啊，哈哈。David真是造型师吗？以后还有人敢找他造型？毁人不倦啊你们

As to performance, It is good to perform natural in a mockumentary. No performing is the best performing. You all did that. Anyway, you are professional actors, so the prise is to David and Teresa. BTW, is David a real stylist? Maybe nobody dare to hire him after wating this film

不过这部影片可以做的更好。我觉得最遗憾的是，明明这部片子讲了那么多内容，前面却表现的匆匆忙忙，比如前面10分钟之内，就讲了三个内容“唱功不好”、“不公平和约”、“利用媒体炒作”，这些内容可以扩充一下——尤其是利用媒体炒作那里，前面铺垫不清楚，很生硬。这些内容节奏也可以慢一些，留给我们回味一下的时间。但现在的感觉呢，和那些大制作正相反，他们是没内容装深沉，你们是有内容但是表现手法太浅太快，而且被后面涌上来的内容覆盖了，印象不深。

This film can be perfect. I think the problem is cadence of film.In my opinion, topic are too many and too fast to impressed in first part of film, and less, boring in following part. eg. it took only 10 mins to describe 3 interesing topics at the begining: unqualified singing, tough contract and promotion using media. they can be put more stuff in them, and took more time to preform to make us audience have more time to understand and make more impression. But now, before I accepted and impressed one topic, the other topics are coming in, cover the former.

可是影片后面却让人觉得内容不足，时间冗长，比如讲述个人风格，矛盾和友谊的部分长达25分钟，和前面10分钟讲三个内容形成鲜明反差。友谊是重要的，但是这么长时间讲述比较单一的问题，让影片的结构显得很奇怪。更何况，影片的最后，15分钟的访谈又回到了音乐圈的问题。

And the following portion that describe personality and relationship is quite long to 25 mins. I understand friendship is quite important in this film, but there is a contrast between begining portion and this portion, many topics are crowded together first, then a few topics take long time following, it make the film structure wired. And, at the last portion, the film is back to the topics at the begining to discuss entertainment business, put friendship aside.

说到这些访谈，太多了！单一的访谈形式，有点无聊。讲的东西也太多太杂，好像迫不及待要让观众知道所有事情，呼啦啦拥上来说教，不太好接受啊，倒象为了凑够90分钟不得不塞进去的。

Speak of the interviews at the end of film, don't you feel they are too much and boring? much topics, only talking, it looks like the director can't wait to put a lot of things into our brain by the end of film. But I feel hard to accept so many concept in such a simple way. Therefore, it also seems like you have to attach these interviews to fill the 90 mins.

好啦，总体来说，有想法有行动去拍着一部电影已经很好，做出来的影片也还不错，Daniel第一次当导演，以后一定会更熟练的哦。

Overall, It is great to have thought first and take action later to make such a meaningful film. And the film is talented and funny. It is the first time Daniel being a director, I think he did good work and will be more skillful in future.

just get a chance to watch HK version, it do is better than re-edited Mandarin version. Don't have weaknesses i mentioned in previous post. So, it is pretty good film.Hope Daniel get new director award.