! Choose language
選擇你的語言
close  
 語言 


JRS
Rank: 7Rank: 7Rank: 7
Mummy 3...see it 8/1/08!


Posts 4616
Registered 2007-4-14
Status Offline
Posted at 2007-9-16 02:36 AM  Send PM 
RESOLVED: More than 20 replies vs. less than 20 replies

Here's a nitpicky thing that I've noticed for awhile but I haven't seen addressed.  Within the forums, there's a "key" listing the icons that show next to threads.  This list is at the bottom of the page to the right of "Members Visiting This Forum."

The list looks like this (without the icons):

New Posts            More than 20 replies                                  Closed Threads
No New Posts      More than 20 replies        Participated Threads

I have a feeling that the one I highlighted above should actually read, "Less than 20 replies"....I'm only guessing, though.




Love, Kindness, Generosity

"Create something that you are interested in, no matter how seemingly petty, for it cannot be unimportant if it interests your heart." -- Jet Li
stephen
Rank: 9


Posts 158
Registered 2007-1-7
Status Offline
Posted at 2007-9-24 11:28 AM  Send PM 
Actually, the legend, although confusing, is correct. The darker version is for threads with more than 20 replies which have new posts since you last visited. The lighter version if for threads ALSO with more than 20 replies but with no new posts since you last visited.
JRS
Rank: 7Rank: 7Rank: 7
Mummy 3...see it 8/1/08!


Posts 4616
Registered 2007-4-14
Status Offline
Posted at 2007-9-27 05:28 AM  Send PM 
Well, that's weird but okay.  Thanks for the reply.

Edit:  Now that I think about it, isn't it redundant?  When we go into a forum, anything that has new posts says "NEW" so we know that there's something out there that we haven't read since our last visit.  Okay.  I've said my piece.  

[ Last edited by  JRS at 2007-9-26 02:30 PM ]




Love, Kindness, Generosity

"Create something that you are interested in, no matter how seemingly petty, for it cannot be unimportant if it interests your heart." -- Jet Li

Archiver  Processed in 0.036156 second(s), 6 queries