Originally posted by RenRen at 2007-7-6 03:35 AM
Umm...so why are we comparing four actors who are all in a different point in their careers?
sometimes ppl are in the (film) industry by chance and just continue with it; whether or not they have a talent for it is another case.
Originally posted by yulien at 2007-7-6 08:32 AM
my take, i see Terence as a more potential actor...maybe Andrew but i don't know cause i never really seen all of their movie. my POV regarding Terence having the potential is cause he really know how to let loose and joke around. so, i guess he can take part in a role and 'get into' being the character easily.
i have to say (again), i love Daniel's acting in Divergence (wtih Ekin and Aaron). i think he played his character well, and i see that he sorta understand his role better than the rest he had played before. New Police Story is a good one as well.
yeah my reasons are similar, in the improv scenes (credit to daniel's direction) in the heavenly kings, whilst all the others were reasonably restrained and played it simple, terence was the one really bringing the dialogue to the table..
i saw divergence recently and i agree daniel was pretty decent in there. characters with attitude he can portray convincingly; in protege as someone with deeper emotions e.g sympathy, moral dilemma
etc he pulled it off decently.
though saying that derek yee has the got best of every actor he has worked with imo in the films, lost in time, one night in mk, 2 young and protege..
p.s i don't get with the aaron kwok bashing in divergence e.g overacting, unintentional hilarious scenes (car rolling backwards). i thought he was really good and it's commendable he's lauching himself as a serious actor.
[
Last edited by director at 2007-7-9 10:21 AM ]